Work
8 min read
In this piece
What digital marketing has to do with product design
Marketing can make a promise that the product is unable to keep.
Product design can create value that marketing fails to make visible.
Companies often treat these as separate mistakes owned by separate teams. Marketing is responsible for attention, acquisition, and conversion. Product design is responsible for usability, flows, and features. One team brings people to the door; another decides what happens after they enter.
The organisation chart may separate them.
The customer does not.
To the person using the product, the advertisement, landing page, sign-up form, onboarding flow, interface language, support email, and cancellation screen are parts of one experience. Each moment changes what they expect from the next.
This is what digital marketing has to do with product design: they shape different stages of the same promise.
The relationship can be understood as a loop:
Promise → Entry → Experience → Feedback → Revision
Marketing influences the promise and the path into the product. Product design influences whether the experience makes that promise feel true. Behaviour across both stages creates feedback. The strongest teams use that feedback to revise the message and the product together.
Break the loop and both disciplines become worse at their jobs.
Marketing creates an expectation before the product creates an experience
Every piece of marketing teaches the audience how to interpret the product.
A headline decides which problem matters. A demonstration decides which feature deserves attention. A testimonial signals who the product is for. A price page frames the value. A call to action tells the visitor what kind of commitment comes next.
None of this is neutral packaging.
It creates an expectation.
Suppose a campaign promises that a complex task can be completed in minutes. The visitor arrives expecting speed. If onboarding requires several unexplained steps, the product has not merely created friction. It has contradicted the frame established by the marketing.
Or suppose a product is genuinely flexible, but the website presents it through one narrow use case. The interface may deliver more value than the audience ever discovers because the marketing trained people to see less.
This is why “get people in, then let the product speak for itself” is incomplete advice. The product never speaks in a vacuum. People hear it through an expectation that has already been shaped.
Marketing is the opening sentence of the product experience.
Entry is where the handoff usually breaks
The most fragile part of the customer journey is often the seam between interest and use.
Marketing has persuaded someone that a problem is worth solving. Product has built a way to solve it. But the transition between those states may be treated as a technical formality: create an account, verify an email, choose a plan, answer a few questions, and begin.
This is not a formality.
It is where the customer tests whether the company understands the promise it just made.
If a product is marketed as simple, the entry should not require unexplained configuration. If it is marketed as personalised, the onboarding should not feel generic. If the audience is anxious or unfamiliar with the category, the first screen should not assume expert vocabulary.
The entry experience has three jobs:
confirm that the person is in the right place;
show what will happen next;
create the smallest credible success.
Marketing and product design need to agree on all three.
Otherwise each team optimises a different definition of conversion. Marketing celebrates the registration. Product discovers that the person never completed the first meaningful action.
The registration was real, but the value was not.
The interface continues the marketing—with consequences
The phrase “product marketing” often brings to mind positioning, launches, sales materials, and campaigns. But the interface itself continues to communicate the product’s value.
Every label explains what the product believes is important. Every default suggests how it should be used. Every empty state either helps a person begin or leaves them staring at the absence of their own work. Every error message reveals whether the company has designed for ordinary human mistakes.
This was especially clear in the published work around Wishtales AI, a creation platform for younger users. The technology could support ambitious outputs, but important actions were difficult to find and parts of the creative flow were rigid. Hiding an export action did not only create a usability problem. It weakened the moment in which the product’s promise became real: turning an idea into something the user could take away.
Giving users more control over genres and final outputs was not simply an interface improvement. It clarified what kind of creative relationship the product wanted to offer.
The product says what it values through what it makes easy.
That is marketing in its most consequential form. A campaign can claim that users are in control. The interface has to decide whether the claim survives contact with reality.
Content belongs to both disciplines
Content teams are often placed closer to marketing than product design. They create campaign copy, social posts, newsletters, case studies, and website pages.
But content also shapes product comprehension.
Consider a person trying to understand an unfamiliar immigration process. The problem is not only finding the right button. They need to understand terminology, sequence, eligibility, uncertainty, and what action is appropriate now.
In the work around Unshackled, the newsletter and website were not separate from the user experience. Stories, resources, navigation, and approachable language helped people orient themselves in a high-stakes subject. The content was part of how the service became usable.
This produces an important distinction:
Promotional content creates interest. Product content creates capability.
Sometimes one piece does both.
A strong explainer can help someone discover a service while also helping an existing user complete a task. A case study can generate trust while teaching prospects how the process works. An onboarding email can reduce confusion while reminding the user why the product matters.
Teams lose this opportunity when marketing copy and product copy are written from different mental models.
The landing page says “effortless.” The onboarding email says “follow these twelve steps.” The interface invents a third vocabulary. The help centre introduces a fourth.
The customer has to translate between teams that never translated for one another.
Feedback closes the loop
Marketing produces signals: impressions, clicks, replies, sign-ups, search behaviour, sales conversations, objections, and reasons people hesitate.
Product produces signals too: activation, repeated use, incomplete flows, feature adoption, support questions, cancellations, and the places where users create workarounds.
Looking at either set alone creates an incomplete diagnosis.
Imagine a campaign with a high click-through rate and weak activation. Marketing might conclude that the product onboarding is failing. Product might conclude that marketing is attracting the wrong audience.
Either could be right. Both could be partly right.
The message may create an expectation the product does not meet. The audience may understand the promise but encounter an entry flow designed for a different level of knowledge. The product may solve the problem but fail to surface the relevant feature. The campaign may optimise curiosity rather than fit.
The correct response is not for each team to defend its metric.
It is to trace the person through the complete loop.
Ask:
What did this person believe before arriving?
Which message caused them to enter?
What did they expect the first experience to do?
Where did behaviour diverge from that expectation?
Is the strongest next change in the message, entry, product, or audience definition?
Metrics become useful when they locate a question. They become dangerous when they are used as departmental scoreboards.
Revision can move in either direction
When marketing and product disagree, companies often assume the product is fixed and the message must adjust around it.
Sometimes that is correct. Marketing may be promising a benefit too broadly, using language that attracts poor-fit customers, or emphasising a secondary capability that the product does not support well.
But sometimes the campaign has discovered a real need the product has not fully addressed.
Repeated questions in sales calls may expose missing guidance. Search behaviour may reveal that customers use different language from the internal team. A highly resonant message may show that the audience values an outcome the roadmap treats as secondary.
Marketing should not dictate the product based on every click. Product design should not dismiss market feedback because it arrived outside formal research.
The loop works when each signal is treated as evidence to interpret, not an order to obey.
Revision may mean:
narrowing the promise;
changing the audience;
redesigning the entry flow;
surfacing an existing feature;
adding explanation at the moment of uncertainty;
changing the product itself;
or deciding that an attractive opportunity does not fit the strategy.
The point is not to make marketing and product identical. It is to let information travel between them without losing meaning.
But specialised teams exist for a reason
They do.
Marketing and product design require different skills, methods, tools, and time horizons. A designer should not have to optimise every interface decision for campaign performance. A marketer should not have to own interaction architecture. Healthy tension between disciplines can prevent either one from becoming narrow.
The problem is not specialisation.
It is isolation.
Specialists need a shared model of the customer promise, the entry path, the meaningful product action, and the feedback that determines whether the system is working.
Without that model, collaboration becomes a series of handoffs. Marketing delivers leads. Product receives users. Content fills the gaps. Analytics reports the damage after launch.
With it, each team can make better decisions inside its own discipline because it understands the consequences outside it.
Audit the promise as one experience
Choose one important customer journey and place five artefacts side by side:
the message that attracts the person;
the page on which they decide to begin;
the first product or service interaction;
the first meaningful outcome;
the message that brings them back.
Then look for discontinuities.
Does the vocabulary change? Does the level of complexity jump? Does “instant” become a long setup? Does “personal” become a generic flow? Does the most valuable action remain hidden? Does the follow-up talk about features when the customer cared about an outcome?
That audit will usually reveal problems no single dashboard owns.
Digital marketing and product design are connected because expectation and experience are connected. One tells people what kind of future is possible. The other lets them discover whether that future is credible.
The work is not finished when someone clicks.
It is finished when the experience makes the promise feel true.